With over one hundred students in attendance, the year old female exhibitionist disrobed below her waist, thus enabling her year-old fiance to insert into her a mechanical sex device and stimulate her to orgasm.
It was a very graphic representation of a woman masturbating…. It would be porno, basically. Kieltyka also arranged with Bailey opportunities to present to students in his Human Sexuality class herself, her history, and her understanding of transsexuality. Kieltyka also presented a short video compilation she had made…. The woman whom Chuck appears as masturbates through simulated finger-clitoral stimulation and through the use of a dildo attached to the floor; she straddles the dildo and thrusts up and down so that it looks as if the dildo is going in and out of her vagina.
Kieltyka overlaid an audio clip from a porn video in this segment to provide the sound of a woman reaching orgasm. Immediately after this segment, the compilation cuts to a postop scene of Anjelica standing topless in a bikini bottom and moccasins, looking radiant and being dramatically bathed in a Rushing water fall.
She brushes back her long dark hair with her hand and motions to two nearby women unknown to her to also take off their tops. Bailey had this to say about his recent decision to allow a live sex show: Is he really that intellectually bankrupt? Or is this further evidence of his moral bankruptcy? Without making an explicit assertion, he is trying to divert attention from his corrupt and execrable decision by hinting that opposition derives from overprotective or puritanical impulses.
Bailey demonstrates the maturity and wisdom of an adolescent. Only someone lost in spiritual darkness, as Bailey clearly is, could defend this. Wisdom and respect for the sanctity of sexuality dictate that, among many things, sex acts are private acts. Four questions pop into my fragile, fearful, sex-negative mind: What kind of perverse ideas did Bailey weave into classroom lectures and discussions? Does he bear any moral culpability for undermining the moral development of the young people whose parents paid thousands of dollars for a Northwestern education?
Does he bear any moral culpability if this live sex show contributes in even a small way to a current or future porn addiction in one of his students? Is Bailey complicit in the exploitation, degradation,and objectification of the obviously troubled young woman who demonstrated this act in front of scores of strangers? The author of that article was kind enough to include a link to a porn website that provides diagrams of and instructions for a variety of sexual positions. An initial feckless statement from the vice president for University Relations no pun intended , Alan Cubbage, appeared to defend Bailey: Northwestern University faculty members engage in teaching and research on a wide variety of topics, some of them controversial and at the leading edge of their respective disciplines….
The University supports the efforts of its faculty to further the advancement of knowledge. But perhaps wiser heads will prevail. I have recently learned of the after-class activity associated with Prof. Although the incident took place in an after-class session that students were not required to attend and students were advised in advance, several times, of the explicit nature of the activity, I feel it represented extremely poor judgment on the part of our faculty member.
Northwestern faculty members engage in teaching and research on a wide variety of topics, some of them controversial. That is the nature of a university. However, in this instance, I have directed that we investigate fully the specifics of this incident, and also clarify what constitutes appropriate pedagogy, both in this instance and in the future.
Many members of the Northwestern community are disturbed by what took place on our campus.